CASE REPORT


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10055-0143
AMEI's Current Trends in Diagnosis & Treatment
Volume 6 | Issue 1 | Year 2022

Anterior-based Tongue Flap for the Closure of Posterior Palatal Defect: A Case Report


Simarjit Singh1, Amit Dhawan2, Tejinder Kaur3, Ramandeep Singh Bhullar4, Sarika Kapila5

1,3–5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India

2Department of Maxillofacial and Head Neck Services, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India

Corresponding Author: Simarjit Singh, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India, Phone: +91 9781639093, e-mail: drsimarjitsinghsandhar@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Singh S, Dhawan A, Kaur T, et al. Anterior-based Tongue Flap for the Closure of Posterior Palatal Defect: A Case Report. AMEI’s Curr Trends Diagn Treat 2022;6(1):12–14.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

Received on: 03 August 2022; Accepted on: 13 September 2022; Published on: 20 December 2022

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this case report is to analyze the use of anterior-based tongue flaps for the closure of posterior palatal defects.

Background: Palatal fistulas following trauma, benign or malignant pathology, and congenital defects are debilitating conditions rendering patients difficulty in swallowing and speech impairment. Reconstruction of such defects is challenging due to the scarcity of soft tissues for primary closure. Tongue flap has proved to be a safe and effective method of restoring functionality with acceptable donor site morbidity.

Case description: In this study, the authors present a case in which an anterior-based tongue flap and facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap were used to close the posterior palatal fistula and oroantral communication, respectively.

Conclusion: The tongue flap remains the flap of choice for managing anterior palatal fistulae, leaving apart its only drawback of two-staged procedure and transient patient discomfort.

Clinical significance: Tongue flap, commonly termed “workhorse flap“ in the repair of palatal defects, is recommended provided that patient selection and surgical technique are meticulous.

Keywords: Facial artery musculomucosal flap, Palatal fistula, Tongue flap.

BACKGROUND

An unusual communication between the oral cavity and nasal cavity is considered to be a palatal fistula. A palatal fistula can occur as a result of any trauma, cyst, neoplasm, radiation therapy or infectious lesions, granulomas, and syphilis, even after surgery of cleft palate.1

The affected patients usually complain of uncontrolled regurgitation via the nose, a variable amount of speech impairment because of velopharyngeal insufficiency, which impairs the articulatory abilities resulting in a hypernasal speech.2,3

In 1901, Eiselberg first used pedicled tongue flaps for surgical management of intraoral defects. However, it was Guerrero-Santos and Altamirano, in 1966, who advocated the use of tongue tissue for managing hard palate deformities.

The vascular supply of the tongue is via the lingual artery with its four branches, namely, supra hyoid, dorsal lingual, deep lingual, and sublingual artery.

In addition to the extensive contralateral anastomotic network,4 clinical applications of tongue flap reside primarily with reconstruction surgeries of oral defects including that of the hard and soft palate, oroantral fistula closure, alveolar clefts, oral submucous fibrosis, and in certain lip reconstructions.5

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 21-year-old man reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar with a post-traumatic posterior palatal fistula having difficulty in swallowing and speech along with regurgitation of fluids through the nose due to an oroantral communication present distal to tooth 25. A CT facial bones revealed a posterior palatal defect measuring 8 mm × 12 mm × 4 mm. Anteriorly based tongue flap was chosen to be the plan of reconstructive procedure. The patient surgically prepared and general anesthesia was induced under nasotracheal intubation.

Peripheral edges of the fistula were injected with 2% lignocaine containing 1:20,0000 adrenaline. A circumferential incision was placed around the fistula. The nasal mucosal layer was carefully dissected and raised, and nasal layer was closed using tension-free resorbable sutures.

A U-shaped pedicle of anteriorly based tongue flap was dissected, raised, and rotated upwards, which was sutured to the revised edges of the palatal defect. The oroantral communication distal to the left second premolar was closed using a FAMM. The patient was put on feeding via Ryle’s tube after the first stage of surgery. The vascularity of the tongue flap once confirmed, the pedicle was separated from the donor site after a period of 3 weeks under general anesthesia, and the raw surface defect was sutured using 3-0 vicryl. The patient was discharged after confirming the vascularity of the flap and was put on a soft diet. Regular follow-up was done after every 1 week for 3 weeks and then after 1, 3 and 5th months postoperatively.

This procedure completely eradicated the chief complaints of the patient thus providing utmost satisfaction to the patient as well as the operating team (Figs 1 to 5).

Fig. 1: Preoperative

Fig. 2: Coronal CT section

Fig. 3: Immediate intraoperative

Fig. 4: Vascularized flap after 1 week

Fig. 5: Postoperative 1 month

DISCUSSION

Local flaps that can be used for the reconstruction of small- to moderate-sized palatal defects include the palatal island flap,6 buccinator myomucosal flap,7 buccal fat pad flap,8 and a multivariate option of tongue flap designs that can be based anteriorly, posteriorly, and laterally.1,2 Intraoral defects having diameter larger than 1.5 cm are difficult to manage with local buccal or palatal flaps because they may lead to an inadequate closure as a result of an insufficient quantity of donor tissue.9

Hence, defects having diameters of 1.5–3.5 cm can be best treated with dorsal tongue flaps, considering their excellent vascular supply and abundant soft tissue for reconstruction.9

Tongue flaps are also used in the management of defects of the tonsillar area, tongue base, soft palate, buccal mucosa, and floor of the mouth.9

However, contraindications of its use include large pharyngeal defects that extend into the piriform sinus or defects that can heal by secondary intention or with a simple skin graft.9

The location and size of the defect remain the prime consideration while planning the extensions of the tongue flap. The diameter of the flap should be 20% greater than the defect to obtain a tension-free closure and a minimum thickness of 3 mm to incorporate viable submucous plexus.

Flaps of 10 mm thickness and length up to 2/3 of the dorsum of the tongue can be used if more bulk is required.10 Posteriorly based flaps are better suitable for defects of the soft palate, retromolar area, or posterior buccal mucosa. Whereas, anteriorly based flaps are suitable for defects of the hard palate, anterior buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth and lips.11

The flap may appear to be unhealthy or dusky in color following surgery, but the absence of fistula in the early postoperative period warrants the success of the flap.12 In cases of vascular flap congestion, systemic heparin can be used.9

Pin pricking the flap helps in venous outflow. Hyperbaric oxygen as an adjunctive methodology can also be employed, if required.9 The division of flap in this case was done after 3 weeks.

Postoperative complications include hematoma, dehiscence, lack of sensation, and taste perception, none of which were encountered in this particular case.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tongue flap, commonly termed “workhorse flap” in the repair of palatal defects is recommended provided that patient selection and surgical technique are meticulous.13

CONCLUSION

Tongue flaps are versatile flaps with only the disadvantage of a two-stage procedure.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The mentors of the authors guided them through this case and helped in achieving rehabilitating results.

REFERENCES

1. Posnick JC, Getz SB Jr. Surgical closure of end-stage palatal fistulas using anteriorly-based dorsal tongue flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45(11):907–912. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90438-1.

2. Ogle OE. The management of oronasal fistulas in the cleft palate patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2002;14(4):553–562. DOI: 10.1016/s1042-3699(02)00050-x.

3. Buchbinder D, St-Hilaire H. Tongue flaps in maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 2003;15:475–486. DOI: 10.1016/S1042-3699(03)00065-7.

4. Bracka A. The blood supply of the dorsal tongue flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1981;34(4):379–384. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(81)90040-0.

5. Mohan V, Nair RU, Usha AM. Versatility of tongue flaps for closure of palatal defects: Case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(1):ZD31–ZD33. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23978.9219.

6. Moore BA, Magdy E, Netterville JL, et al. Palatal reconstruction with the palatal island flap. Laryngoscope 2003;113 (6):946–951. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200306000-00007.

7. Bozola AR, Gasques JA, Carriquiry CE, et al. The buccinator musculomucosal flap: Anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:250–257. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198908000-00010.

8. Abbas K, Behnam B, Mohammad M, et al. Effectiveness of buccal fat and closing residual mid palatal and posterior palatal fistulas in patient’s previously treated for clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:e416–e419. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.010.

9. Beech R, Reid J, Fung H, et al. Anteriorly based tongue flap for closure of a posterior palatal defect in a patient with exaggerated gag reflex. World J Med Surg Case Rep 2015; 4:43–50. https://www.npplweb.com/wjmscr/content/4/10.

10. Smith TS, Schaberg SJ, Collins JT. Repair of a palatal defect using a dorsal pedicle tongue flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40(10):670–673. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(82)90120-3.

11. Vasishta SM, Krishnan G, Rai YS, et al. The versatility of the tongue flap in the closure of palatal fistula. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2012;5(3):145–160. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313352.

12. Moore R. Head and neck surgery—otolaryngology, 3rd ed, vols I & II, by Byron J. Bailey, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001; pp. 2485. Head Neck 2003;25:343. DOI: 10.1002/hed.10227.

13. Gupta N, Shetty S, Degala S. Tongue flap: a “workhorse flap” in repair of recurrent palatal fistulae. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;24(1):93–101. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-019-00823-9.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.